We investigate the power soltera2 is a positive example for C, and of labeled examples for describing description-logic px10 and teslaY are negative examples for C concepts. Specifically, we systematically study the In fact, as it turns out, C is the only EL-concept (up to equivalence) existence and efficient computability of finite characterisations, that fits these three labeled examples. In other words, i.e., finite sets of labeled examples these three labeled examples "uniquely characterize" C within that uniquely characterize a single concept, for a the class of all EL-concepts. This shows that the above three wide variety of description logics between EL and labeled examples are a good choice of examples. Adding any ALCQI,both without an ontology and in the presence additional examples would be redundant. Note, however, that of a DL-Lite ontology. Finite characterisations this depends on the choice of description logic. For instance, are relevant for debugging purposes, and their existence the richer concept language ALC allows for other concept is a necessary condition for exact learnability expressions such as Bicycle Contains.Basket that also fit.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown significant achievements in solving a wide range of tasks. Recently, LLMs' capability to store, retrieve and infer with symbolic knowledge has drawn a great deal of attention, showing their potential to understand structured information. However, it is not yet known whether LLMs can understand Description Logic (DL) ontologies. In this work, we empirically analyze the LLMs' capability of understanding DL-Lite ontologies covering 6 representative tasks from syntactic and semantic aspects. With extensive experiments, we demonstrate both the effectiveness and limitations of LLMs in understanding DL-Lite ontologies. We find that LLMs can understand formal syntax and model-theoretic semantics of concepts and roles. However, LLMs struggle with understanding TBox NI transitivity and handling ontologies with large ABoxes. We hope that our experiments and analyses provide more insights into LLMs and inspire to build more faithful knowledge engineering solutions.

Current techniques for query answering over DL-Lite ontologies have severe limitations in practice, since they either produce complex queries that are inefficient during execution, or require expensive data pre-processing.

In this paper we study instance-level update in DL-LiteA , a well-known description logic that influenced the OWL 2 QL standard. Instance-level update regards insertions and deletions in the ABox of an ontology. In particular we focus on formula-based approaches to instance-level update. We show that DL-LiteA , which is well-known for enjoying first-order rewritability of query answering, enjoys a first-order rewritability property also for instance-level update. That is, every update can be reformulated into a set of insertion and deletion instructions computable through a non-recursive Datalog program with negation. Such a program is readily translatable into a first-order query over the ABox considered as a database, and hence into SQL. By exploiting this result, we implement an update component for DL-LiteA-based systems and perform some experiments showing that the approach works in practice.

Consistent query answering is a standard approach for producing meaningful query answers when data is inconsistent. Recent work on consistent query answering in the presence of ontologies has shown this problem to be intractable in data complexity even for ontologies expressed in lightweight description logics. In order to better understand the source of this intractability, we investigate the complexity of consistent query answering for simple ontologies consisting only of class subsumption and class disjointness axioms. We show that for conjunctive queries with at most one quantified variable, the problem is first-order expressible; for queries with at most two quantified variables, the problem has polynomial data complexity but may not be first-order expressible; and for three quantified variables, the problem may become co-NP-hard in data complexity. For queries having at most two quantified variables, we further identify a necessary and sufficient condition for first-order expressibility. In order to be able to handle arbitrary conjunctive queries, we propose a novel inconsistency-tolerant semantics and show that under this semantics, first-order expressibility is always guaranteed. We conclude by extending our positive results to DL-Lite ontologies without inverse.

We present a formal framework for (minimal) module extraction based on an abstract notion of inseparability w.r.t. a signature between ontologies. Two instances of this framework are discussed in detail for DL-Lite ontologies: concept inseparability, when ontologies imply the same complex concept inclusions over the signature, and query inseparability, when they give the same answers to existential queries for any instance data over the signature. We demonstrate that different types of corresponding minimal modules for these inseparability relations can be automatically extracted from large-scale DL-Lite ontologies by composing the tractable syntactic locality-based module extraction algorithm with intractable extraction algorithms using the  multi-engine QBF solver AQME. The extracted minimal modules are compared with those obtained using non-logic-based approaches.